Zapier vs Make (Integromat) (2026): Which Is Right for You?
Choosing between Zapier and Make (Integromat) comes down to your team's priorities. Zapier is known for most apps of any automation platform (6,000+); easiest to use; reliable, while Make (Integromat) excels at much more powerful than Zapier for complex flows; lower cost; better error handling. In this comparison we break down pricing, features, ease of use, integrations, and support so you can pick the right tool with confidence.
Visual platform to design, build, and automate anything
🏆 Our Verdict: Zapier Wins
Zapier wins overall because most apps of any automation platform (6,000+); easiest to use; reliable. Make (Integromat) remains a solid choice for teams specifically needing power users wanting complex, multi-step automations with advanced data transformation.
Detailed Comparison
| Category | Zapier | Make (Integromat) | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| ease Of Use | 4.3 | 3.7 | Zapier |
| pricing | 3.7 | 4.3 | Make (Integromat) |
| features | 4.5 | 4.6 | Make (Integromat) |
| integrations | 4.9 | 4.6 | Zapier |
| support | 4.1 | 4.0 | Zapier |
ease Of Use
most apps of any automation platform (6,000+); easiest to use; reliable makes Zapier easier to pick up. steeper learning curve than Zapier; visual canvas can be hard to manage for large flows means Make (Integromat) has a steeper initial learning curve.
pricing
Zapier offers a free plan while make (integromat) also has a free tier. At the paid tier, Zapier starts at $19.99/mo vs. Make (Integromat) at $9/mo, so your choice depends on team size and required features.
features
Make (Integromat) edges ahead on features — much more powerful than Zapier for complex flows; lower cost; better error handling. Zapier is more focused, which some teams prefer, but gets expensive quickly; slower than native integrations; limited logic depth.
integrations
Zapier connects with more third-party tools and has a wider native integration library. Make (Integromat) covers the essentials well but may require Zapier or Make for less common app connections.
support
Zapier offers more responsive customer support channels and a more comprehensive help centre. Make (Integromat)'s support is adequate but response times can be slower, especially on lower-tier plans.
Pricing Comparison
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Zapier better than Make (Integromat)?
It depends on your use case. Zapier is our top pick overall because most apps of any automation platform (6,000+); easiest to use; reliable. However, Make (Integromat) may be a better fit if power users wanting complex, multi-step automations with advanced data transformation.
Can I migrate from Zapier to Make (Integromat)?
Yes, both tools offer export options. Zapier typically exports to common formats (CSV, JSON, or PDF) and Make (Integromat) provides import wizards to help you bring in that data. Plan a migration window and test with a subset of data first.
Which is cheaper: Zapier or Make (Integromat)?
Zapier has a free plan available. Make (Integromat) also offers a free plan. At scale, pricing depends on seat count and features needed, so compare annual plans for the best deal.
Does Zapier integrate with Make (Integromat)?
Direct native integrations between the two are limited, but you can connect them via Zapier, Make, or their respective APIs. Check each platform's integration directory for the latest available connectors.
Which tool is better for small teams?
Zapier is generally more accessible for small teams thanks to its simpler onboarding and generous free tier. Small teams often benefit from a tool with a shorter learning curve so everyone can hit the ground running.
Looking for more options?
See all alternatives to these tools