Loom vs Microsoft Teams (2026): Which Is Right for You?
Choosing between Loom and Microsoft Teams comes down to your team's priorities. Loom is known for fastest way to record and share screen + camera videos with instant link sharing, while Microsoft Teams excels at free with Microsoft 365; deep Office integration; enterprise-grade compliance. In this comparison we break down pricing, features, ease of use, integrations, and support so you can pick the right tool with confidence.
Meet, chat, call, and collaborate in one place
🏆 Our Verdict: Loom Wins
Loom wins overall because fastest way to record and share screen + camera videos with instant link sharing. Microsoft Teams remains a solid choice for teams specifically needing organisations already using Microsoft 365 / Office wanting native integration.
Detailed Comparison
| Category | Loom | Microsoft Teams | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| ease Of Use | 4.8 | 4.0 | Loom |
| pricing | 4.3 | 4.6 | Microsoft Teams |
| features | 4.2 | 4.5 | Microsoft Teams |
| integrations | 4.3 | 4.3 | Loom |
| support | 4.3 | 4.2 | Loom |
ease Of Use
fastest way to record and share screen + camera videos with instant link sharing makes Loom easier to pick up. UI is less polished than Slack; slower to release features means Microsoft Teams has a steeper initial learning curve.
pricing
Loom offers a free plan while microsoft teams also has a free tier. At the paid tier, Loom starts at $12.50/user/mo vs. Microsoft Teams at Included with Microsoft 365, so your choice depends on team size and required features.
features
Microsoft Teams edges ahead on features — free with Microsoft 365; deep Office integration; enterprise-grade compliance. Loom is more focused, which some teams prefer, but limited editing capabilities; not ideal for longer, produced videos.
integrations
Loom connects with more third-party tools and has a wider native integration library. Microsoft Teams covers the essentials well but may require Zapier or Make for less common app connections.
support
Loom offers more responsive customer support channels and a more comprehensive help centre. Microsoft Teams's support is adequate but response times can be slower, especially on lower-tier plans.
Pricing Comparison
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Loom better than Microsoft Teams?
It depends on your use case. Loom is our top pick overall because fastest way to record and share screen + camera videos with instant link sharing. However, Microsoft Teams may be a better fit if organisations already using Microsoft 365 / Office wanting native integration.
Can I migrate from Loom to Microsoft Teams?
Yes, both tools offer export options. Loom typically exports to common formats (CSV, JSON, or PDF) and Microsoft Teams provides import wizards to help you bring in that data. Plan a migration window and test with a subset of data first.
Which is cheaper: Loom or Microsoft Teams?
Loom has a free plan available. Microsoft Teams also offers a free plan. At scale, pricing depends on seat count and features needed, so compare annual plans for the best deal.
Does Loom integrate with Microsoft Teams?
Direct native integrations between the two are limited, but you can connect them via Zapier, Make, or their respective APIs. Check each platform's integration directory for the latest available connectors.
Which tool is better for small teams?
Loom is generally more accessible for small teams thanks to its simpler onboarding and generous free tier. Small teams often benefit from a tool with a shorter learning curve so everyone can hit the ground running.
Also Compare Loom With
Looking for more options?
See all alternatives to these tools